Peter Padraic O'Sullivan ([info]writerpo) wrote,
@ 2008-08-27 19:16:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Politics: The American Dream

The American Dream


I've spent most of this election cycle marveling at the prevailing narrative (and how I am both amazed and appalled at that election buzzword) of Obama as the arugula noshing, effete, intellectual elitist. In fact, I was very pleased at the effect of the Democratic Convention's first night and Michelle Obama's wonderful speech, which helped belie the conservative notion of the Obamas as others. From all that I've seen and heard, the Obamas are, in fact, the embodiment of the American Dream.

What is that dream?

The American dream is what we're told all through childhood. Work hard and you can achieve anything, including wealth, both monetary and familial. The Obamas have both in abundance. Barack Obama, raised by working grandparents and a single mother, went to good schools (on scholarship), worked hard, and went on to become the editor for the Harvard Law Review. The prevailing narrative focuses on his attending Harvard as proof of his elitism (never mind that "regular guy" George W. Bush also attended Harvard) and ignores how he got there. The narrative also ignores that Obama passed up opportunities to earn a six figure salary straight out of law school for a life of public service, first helping working families in Chicago, before moving on to State Senate, and then national. In the meantime he wrote a book and it did well. He earned money, married, bought a house, and made a family. He is worth several million dollars. Through hard work, he made the American Dream happen.

So what's the problem? Why is the Right able to spin him as the other when he epitomizes everything we all hope for?

John McCain is why. If Barack Obama represents the American Dream, then John McCain represents the American Fantasy.

Barack Obama worked hard and became rich. John McCain won the lottery.

We pay lip service to the idea of working to our riches, but when it comes right down to it, we would much rather have a sack of money fall into our laps. That sack, for McCain, was named Cindy. She landed in his lap, several times before he finally left his loyal, but scarred first wife, and offered him a life of luxury.

People can respect Obama for his hard work and earning his place in America, but they want to be McCain with so many houses he can't count them without taking off his shoes.

People can respect Obama, but they don't. Instead they want to believe the prevailing narrative because the reality shames them. It shames them because they haven't done the same. It also shames them because they know, in their heart of hearts that he has earned their respect, but their envy keeps them from giving it. The lie is poultice for a burning shame. They respect McCain because they cannot be envious of luck. Luck is ineffable. It is beyond their control.

We preach the American Dream, but when it comes right down to it, we admire the American Fantasy.
~Peter



(Post a new comment)


[info]maradydd
2008-08-28 07:05 am UTC (link)
Saw this linked in [info]jdeguzman's journal before I found it on my flist. I've linked it and I hope more people do. This needs to be read far and wide.

(Though I am biting my tongue waiting for someone to claim that the sentence "The Obamas have both in spades" is racist.)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]writerpo
2008-08-28 12:32 pm UTC (link)
Changed. I don't need anyone dismissing my argument because of a poor choice of phrase. There are too many strawmen in politics.

~Peter

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jordan179
2008-08-28 07:48 am UTC (link)
Obama's "hard work?" Since when? He started life upper middle-class. What, you think that because he's coffee-colored that he was ever poor?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]spider88
2008-08-28 08:12 am UTC (link)
Working single mothers generally do not provide an upper middle-class standard of living. That must have been some child support settlement.

Even then, plenty of people who start life upper middle-class do nothing with themselves.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ernunnos
2008-08-28 12:05 pm UTC (link)
Working single mothers generally do not provide an upper middle-class standard of living. That must have been some child support settlement.

Obama's step-father Lolo Soetoro was a geologist who worked for the Indonesian government and later Mobil Oil. While there's no indication he was particularly wealthy, he seems to have provided his wife and children with a reasonably middle-class life. (Private school, a home in a middle-class neighborhood.) Obama later lived with his grandparents, and his grandmother was "one of the Bank of Hawaii's first female vice presidents", the "Grand Dame of Escrow". Upper-middle class sounds about right.

What did Obama do with that background? And a Harvard education? First he worked as a copy editor for an investment newsletter. Then he became a community organizer. Whatever that is.

And that may be the problem. You tell most working Americans that John McCain married a woman who owns a beer distributor, they go, "Oh, ok." They can understand that. The press refers to them as "Joe Sixpack", and it's a label they aren't offended by. They drink beer, everybody they know drinks beer, they buy it in the store, they understand how wholesale works, it makes sense that you could make a lot of money at it. It sounds like a wholesome, American way to make a lot of money.

Nobody knows a "community organizer". What does he do? What does he produce? Is it like a pastor? A lawyer? A union boss? It sounds vaguely political, but who elected him? Nobody? So he just appointed himself as some kind of leader? That's not right. That doesn't sound very American. Sounds kind of like he's puttin' on airs.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jordan179
2008-08-28 04:00 pm UTC (link)
Working single mothers generally do not provide an upper middle-class standard of living. That must have been some child support settlement.

Obama was supported by his grandmother. You know, the one he ever-so-gratefully-claimed was a racist because she was once afraid of a crazy black man at a bus stop?

Even then, plenty of people who start life upper middle-class do nothing with themselves.

Well yes, but I never claimed that Obama hadn't achieved a lot. He has, after all, become a Senator, and a Presidential candidate.

All I'm saying is that he did not have an exceptionally hard "struggle" to do so -- his youth was actually rather pampered.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ernunnos
2008-08-28 12:25 pm UTC (link)
Barack Obama worked hard and became rich.

At what? Believe it or not, the American people have a slightly more nuanced view of wealth than Democrats seem to understand. It doesn't just matter how wealthy you are, it matters what business you're in and how you present yourself once you've got it.

John McCain divorced his wife and got a wealthier one who sells stuff people like. The divorce isn't that big of an issue - quite a few Americans are on their second (or third) spouse. Divorce rates in conservative states are even higher than in liberal ones. And most Americans had to be informed of McCain's wealth. It's easy to picture him up to his elbows in a basket of ribs.

Barack Obama's money comes from A. being a Senator (disreputable) B. publishing self-aggrandizing books (lack of humility) and C. his wife's income, which mysteriously more than doubled 2 months after he was elected. (And he later wrote an earmark for her employer.) Now he's slated to accept his party's nomination on a stage fit for a patrician.

That's not the American dream as kids in red states learn it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]spider88
2008-08-28 08:15 pm UTC (link)
My head is throbbing -- our President is supposed to be a beer-swilling, rib-eating, graduated-at-the-very-bottom-of-his-class old man with lots of money, and not a highly successful in academia, accomplished younger man and complex thinker with lots of money??

What the hell is going on...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ernunnos
2008-08-28 09:08 pm UTC (link)

It's called "populism".

And I'm laughing my ass off at the thought that the party that prides itself on diversity, complex thinking, academic knowledge, and accomplishments in organizing people could be so totally unaware of this important tradition of American politics and so out of touch with such a huge swath of the American voting public. Talk about your rich and creamy irony. You could put it on a plate and call it custard.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Paging Mr. Santayana; Mr. Santayana to the front, please
[info]maradydd
2008-08-29 06:11 am UTC (link)
Of course populism is a long-time American tradition. Hell, it even had its own party in the late 1800s; they were best known for backing William Jennings Bryan, who had his ass handed to him by William McKinley, one of our effetest, most intellectual, and most economically effective presidents ever.

Of course, when I think "populist" as an adjective and not as a party name, the first name that comes to mind is Andrew Jackson. Who was, admittedly, very popular, but was also the guy who brought on the Crisis of 1837, kicked off the "spoils system" which still corrupts the executive branch today ("heckuva job, Brownie" indeed), established tariffs which wrecked the economy of the South and helped bring on the Civil War, and ran tens of thousands of Native Americans off their land with treaties which the executive refused to honour.

If conservatism means voting for the guy who comes off as the averagest Joe rather than the person I think will be the most effective leader, then fuck it all, I'm a liberal.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: Paging Mr. Santayana; Mr. Santayana to the front, please - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 04:28 pm UTC
Re: Paging Mr. Santayana; Mr. Santayana to the front, please - [info]maradydd, 2008-08-29 07:30 pm UTC

[info]flame_of_kali
2008-08-28 09:34 pm UTC (link)
How are Democrats not "the American people"? We make up half the population of America.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ernunnos
2008-08-28 09:43 pm UTC (link)
You're totally right. You are America, America is you. There is no other side to try to understand, or sway, or sway by first understanding. Go back to sleep until the election. It's all under control. Democrats will win by a landslide. I personally guarantee it.

HAHAHAHAHAH!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]flame_of_kali
2008-08-29 01:18 am UTC (link)
I suggest you take your own advice. You don't seem to be trying to understand our side of the debate.

In fact, I didn't comment on any of your arguments, so you don't even know my opinion on any issue up for debate.

Perhaps you should stop stereotyping half of the American population.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 02:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]flame_of_kali, 2008-08-29 03:38 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 03:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]flame_of_kali, 2008-08-29 04:34 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 04:39 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]attutle, 2008-10-05 08:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-29 04:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 04:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-29 12:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 03:24 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-30 02:26 am UTC

[info]maradydd
2008-08-29 06:17 am UTC (link)
B. publishing self-aggrandizing books (lack of humility)

Books which a whole bunch of people bought. Guess they must've liked 'em or something. Gee, does that make him ... popular?

I mean, seriously, on the one hand you're praising Cindy McCain for selling something people like, and on the other you're slamming Obama for selling something people like. So which is it? Should people make money by selling things people like, or not? Beer is not inherently morally superior to books, nor are books inherently morally superior to beer.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]ernunnos
2008-08-29 03:28 pm UTC (link)
Compared to beer? No, it makes him popular with a niche market.

And you'll note I didn't say his books didn't sell well or he didn't deserve the income from them. I said they were self-aggrandizing. That's the problem. The fact that someone bought the book doesn't mean they're going to come away with a good impression. To know him is not to love him. Many of the inconvenient truths about Obama - the details behind his slander of his grandmother - come from his own account.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tomcatshanger
2008-08-28 01:35 pm UTC (link)
The American dream is secret police, conscription and socialism?

I think that's the American Left's dream, not The American Dream.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bigby
2008-08-28 03:01 pm UTC (link)
I am confused by your statement. The "dream of the left" as as to say that the left wants secret police (something the right has pushed through the groundwork for against liberal opposition), conscription (from the side that wants us out of the war), and socialism.. oh wait. The last one is a bit exagerative but fine, the left does lean more to socialist than to unregulated capitalism. How do you get to the left wanting secret police and consription?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]tomcatshanger
2008-08-28 11:32 pm UTC (link)
Obama's National Security Force, as well staffed and funded as the military, couldn't help but turn into a secret police.
Democrats have been attempting to reintroduce the draft in congress for years. Obama talks about mandatory "volunteerism". That's conscription.
Mandatory health care is socialism. Welfare is socialism.

Is that easy enough for ya, or do you want links?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-29 03:53 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tomcatshanger, 2008-08-29 04:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-29 12:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]tomcatshanger, 2008-08-29 01:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-30 02:33 am UTC

[info]jordan179
2008-08-28 05:00 pm UTC (link)
As for "struggling," what has Obama ever been through as rough as were McCain's experiences in a North Vietnamese POW camp?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]digitalusrex
2008-08-28 07:52 pm UTC (link)
i don't think its fair to compare the two.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]spider88
2008-08-28 08:13 pm UTC (link)
McCain's POW experiences did not provide him with skills for being President.

If suffering were all it took to qualify as President, I suggest we go through our prison system to find our next leader.

You may also want to read this, written by a fellow POW:
http://www.military.com/opinion/0,15202,164859_1,00.html

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]bigby
2008-08-29 03:58 am UTC (link)
This is a good point. Suffering may be part of character but one hires people for jobs based on skills. If you like the idea the contractor has but they lack the skill to implement you do not hire them. One usualy goes with the more skilled vendor rather than the one who has better charachter and whatnot. At this point there has been so much random noise that it becomes hard to evaluate the real skills involved.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 04:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-29 12:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-29 03:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-30 02:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ernunnos, 2008-08-30 03:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]pjammer, 2008-08-30 07:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bigby, 2008-08-30 12:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]pjammer, 2008-09-01 10:36 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2008-08-30 12:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2008-08-30 12:14 pm UTC

[info]spider88
2008-08-28 08:18 pm UTC (link)
Classism is too much for me sometimes. My god. Classism in this country is so intense, it's not even related to money anymore, much less race. It's related to what damned food you eat and how many syllables are in your speech.

Humans are just monkeys. God, we're so doomed.

(Reply to this)


[info]phyrry
2008-08-29 02:49 am UTC (link)
Wow. Good stuff, Peter, but comments like the ones you've been getting are why I don't discuss politics any more.

Edited at 2008-08-29 02:50 am UTC

(Reply to this)

Great piece.
[info]shep.ca
2008-08-30 12:08 pm UTC (link)
It's amazing watching the contortions the right wing are going through to try to convince themselves that McCain/Palin are a good ticket -- see above.

They've somehow convinced themselves that the self-made, intelligent, thoughtful candidate paired with the long-serving, globally savvy, immensely experienced senator are a WORSE choice than the man that ditched his wife for a beer baroness and a woman who, even now, is being scrutinized for abuse of authority and has less political experience in any real context than most school bus drivers.

The mind boggles.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…